<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math Magic:  Mind-Reading in Person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/</link>
	<description>12 tables, 24 chairs, and plenty of chalk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ashley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow that was so cool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that was so cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ξ</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ξ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another hint:  When a number is a multiple of 9, its digits must add up to a multiple of 9.  For example, 54 is a multiple of 9 and 5+4=9.  The digits of 3489507 add to a multiple of 9 (3+4+8+9+5+0+7 = 36) and sure enough 3489507=9*387723).

This is the fact you use to figure out what number was circled.  It&#039;s also why there would be confusion over circling 0 (in particular, you wouldn&#039;t be able to tell if a 0 or 9 had been circled).

Post in the comments section if you need any further hints!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another hint:  When a number is a multiple of 9, its digits must add up to a multiple of 9.  For example, 54 is a multiple of 9 and 5+4=9.  The digits of 3489507 add to a multiple of 9 (3+4+8+9+5+0+7 = 36) and sure enough 3489507=9*387723).</p>
<p>This is the fact you use to figure out what number was circled.  It&#8217;s also why there would be confusion over circling 0 (in particular, you wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell if a 0 or 9 had been circled).</p>
<p>Post in the comments section if you need any further hints!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ξ</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ξ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/math-magic-mind-reading-in-person/#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the Big Hint:  whenever you take the difference between two numbers with the same digits (so one is a permutation of the other), the result is a multiple of 9.    So 8247-2748 would be a multiple of 9.

There are several ways to prove this.  One indication of how a proof could be constructed is to break each number into its components (8000+200+40+7) - (2000+700+40+8) and then look at each digit:  8000-8 is 8*(1000-1), which is 8*999 [clearly a multiple of 9].  The 200-2000 simplifies to 2*(100-1000) or 2*(-900) which is also a clear multiple of 9.  The 40-40 is 0, which is a trivial multiple of 9, and the 7-700 becomes 7*(1-100) or 7*99.

(Different numbers will of course give different results, but it does turn out that the result that you get will always be a multiple of 9).  

Another hint will follow later.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the Big Hint:  whenever you take the difference between two numbers with the same digits (so one is a permutation of the other), the result is a multiple of 9.    So 8247-2748 would be a multiple of 9.</p>
<p>There are several ways to prove this.  One indication of how a proof could be constructed is to break each number into its components (8000+200+40+7) &#8211; (2000+700+40+8) and then look at each digit:  8000-8 is 8*(1000-1), which is 8*999 [clearly a multiple of 9].  The 200-2000 simplifies to 2*(100-1000) or 2*(-900) which is also a clear multiple of 9.  The 40-40 is 0, which is a trivial multiple of 9, and the 7-700 becomes 7*(1-100) or 7*99.</p>
<p>(Different numbers will of course give different results, but it does turn out that the result that you get will always be a multiple of 9).  </p>
<p>Another hint will follow later&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
