<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick 3 Coincidences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/pick-3-coincidences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/pick-3-coincidences/</link>
	<description>12 tables, 24 chairs, and plenty of chalk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/pick-3-coincidences/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/?p=1761#comment-1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i keep track of pick 3 numbers in kentucky and thru feb 27, 2009 the &#039;2&#039; has not come up in the 2nd position - i.e. x - 2 - x - in 108 draws this year. strange indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i keep track of pick 3 numbers in kentucky and thru feb 27, 2009 the &#8217;2&#8242; has not come up in the 2nd position &#8211; i.e. x &#8211; 2 &#8211; x &#8211; in 108 draws this year. strange indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Petersen</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/pick-3-coincidences/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Petersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/?p=1761#comment-1792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another interesting thought about the lottery.  Basically, we are assuming equal probability for all possibilities.  And for a computer picking the numbers, maybe that is true, but not quite so for the old ping-pong balls.  The ink used to print on the numbers will weigh more for 2 digit numbers (and more for 8 than 1, for example), so there is a very tiny physical disposition for those to fall to the bottom of the pile.

Similarly, we are *assuming* equal probability, but maybe there are other small factors that could affect the outcome, so I would guess that numbers that have already won may be slightly more worth playing as we know it&#039;s a combination that *can* work.  If a combination has never come up before, maybe there&#039;s a reason!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another interesting thought about the lottery.  Basically, we are assuming equal probability for all possibilities.  And for a computer picking the numbers, maybe that is true, but not quite so for the old ping-pong balls.  The ink used to print on the numbers will weigh more for 2 digit numbers (and more for 8 than 1, for example), so there is a very tiny physical disposition for those to fall to the bottom of the pile.</p>
<p>Similarly, we are *assuming* equal probability, but maybe there are other small factors that could affect the outcome, so I would guess that numbers that have already won may be slightly more worth playing as we know it&#8217;s a combination that *can* work.  If a combination has never come up before, maybe there&#8217;s a reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Leiba</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/pick-3-coincidences/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Leiba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/?p=1761#comment-1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom line, of course, is that you have a 1-in-1000 chance of winning on any given day that you play, no matter what number you pick: whether it&#039;s the number that won yesterday, the number that won on your birthday, a number that&#039;s never won before, or your cousin&#039;s IQ.  If you play &quot;666&quot; every single day, or &quot;000&quot; or &quot;123&quot;, you have the same chance: 1 in 1000.  Every time.

And yet one just can&#039;t get that through most people&#039;s skulls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line, of course, is that you have a 1-in-1000 chance of winning on any given day that you play, no matter what number you pick: whether it&#8217;s the number that won yesterday, the number that won on your birthday, a number that&#8217;s never won before, or your cousin&#8217;s IQ.  If you play &#8220;666&#8243; every single day, or &#8220;000&#8243; or &#8220;123&#8243;, you have the same chance: 1 in 1000.  Every time.</p>
<p>And yet one just can&#8217;t get that through most people&#8217;s skulls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
