<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A 26th way to multiply.  Sort of.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/a-26th-way-to-multiply-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/a-26th-way-to-multiply-sort-of/</link>
	<description>12 tables, 24 chairs, and plenty of chalk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 02:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: watchmath</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/a-26th-way-to-multiply-sort-of/#comment-9950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[watchmath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/?p=2688#comment-9950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tutor an 8th grader by using a Singapore Math book. Here is an exercise from that book that need to solved by using the method that you mentioned on your post.

Evaluate
$latex \displaystyle \frac{236}{236^2-(238\times 234)}$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tutor an 8th grader by using a Singapore Math book. Here is an exercise from that book that need to solved by using the method that you mentioned on your post.</p>
<p>Evaluate<br />
<img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cfrac%7B236%7D%7B236%5E2-%28238%5Ctimes+234%29%7D&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=333333&amp;s=0' alt='&#92;displaystyle &#92;frac{236}{236^2-(238&#92;times 234)}' title='&#92;displaystyle &#92;frac{236}{236^2-(238&#92;times 234)}' class='latex' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/a-26th-way-to-multiply-sort-of/#comment-9949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samantha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threesixty360.wordpress.com/?p=2688#comment-9949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a very cute method!  Certainly it&#039;s easier to have a list of perfect squares than to have a 100x100 multiplications table. 

I wonder if that is idea is part of what sparked Fermat-Euler&#039;s method of the sum of two squares.  They said if p is prime and p = 1 mod 4 (or 2) then p is expressible as p = a^2 + b^2 for some integers a, b. The proof is much more complicated than the proof for this formula is and requires imaginary numbers, but that makes sense because we are dealing with addition inside the squares instead of subtraction.  

Nice explanation!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very cute method!  Certainly it&#8217;s easier to have a list of perfect squares than to have a 100&#215;100 multiplications table. </p>
<p>I wonder if that is idea is part of what sparked Fermat-Euler&#8217;s method of the sum of two squares.  They said if p is prime and p = 1 mod 4 (or 2) then p is expressible as p = a^2 + b^2 for some integers a, b. The proof is much more complicated than the proof for this formula is and requires imaginary numbers, but that makes sense because we are dealing with addition inside the squares instead of subtraction.  </p>
<p>Nice explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
