A “Paltry Geometric Dilemma”


One of the greatest “math” scenes in a movie appears in Better Off Dead, starring John Cusack. Watch his geometry teacher (Vincent Schiavelli) in action (transcript below).

The three cardinal trapezoidal formations hereto made orientable in our diagram by connecting the various points HIGK, PEGQ, and LMNO, creating our geometric configurations, which have no properties, but with location (Ohh!) are equal to the described triangle CAB quintuplicated. Therefore, it is also the five triangles composing the aforementioned NIGH – each are equal to the triangle CAB in this geometric concept! (laughter)

Therefore, in a like manner the geometric metaphors can derive a repeated vectoral sum. This was your assignment, and I would like to see the results.

My favorite line: “which have no properties.” Indeed.

2 Responses to “A “Paltry Geometric Dilemma””

  1. Schmorgeshborg of links. « Continuous Everywhere but Differentiable Nowhere Says:

    […] (3) Agreed, the best math scene in any movie [via 360] […]

  2. A Paltry Geometric Dilemma, Part 2 « 360 Says:

    […] (The first Paltry Geometric Dilemma.) […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: