September 19, 2012
A few days ago while in a yarn shop I ran into one of our alumni from a few years ago. Seeing her was fantastic, but the icing on the cake (Sorry. Sort of.) was that she had gotten married last summer to a biochem major, and they designed their own wedding cake. She sent me a couple photos the next day of what is perhaps the coolest wedding cake I’ve ever seen:
Here’s a detail:
Hey, I can answer that question! I’m not as sure about the next one, though.
Congratulations (and Happy Anniversary!) to Emily and Glen — I can think of no better way to start a marriage.
Props to the photographer, Hilary Argentieri, for taking such clear picture!
Oddly, this isn’t even our first math wedding post (see this mathy proposal) although it’s the very first one involving cake.
Edited 9/19 to add: Apparently this came from xkcd — I think that makes me like it all the more.
March 18, 2012
Zero degree (Celsius) is cold. But you know what’s really cold? Negative zero. At least according to the sign that our colleague Nicole saw in Canada.
March 16, 2012
While the Muppet version of Bohemian Rhapsody is still my favorite, this might be a close runner up:
March 14, 2012
In an unfortunately tribute to Pi Day and the importance of mathematics, there was an article in the New York Times yesterday (March 13, 2012) illustrating that the people who need to measure parts don’t always know how:
“The employee responsible for finding a replacement part for a tower crane that ultimately collapsed on the Upper East Side in 2008, killing two workers, testified on Tuesday about his own difficulty with the basic math of measuring key components. Tibor Varganyi, whose formal education ended in the ninth grade in Hungary, struggled how to measure the distance between the roughly 30 bolt holes around a piece of the turntable assembly. He decided to use a ruler.”
The article (“Worker Tells Court He Lacked Math to Measure Crane Part” by Russ Buettner)goes on to explain how the measurements didn’t match up with expectations, so he switched to a protractor, which also didn’t work. This particular replacement part was never used, and the article is primarily about the prosecution’s argument that the company wasn’t worried about the lack of expertise or safety, instead focusing on profits, but the description is still worrisome.
That’s depressing. We’d better recover by looking back at some old Pi Day Sudokus.
September 24, 2011
As you’ll know if you’ve been on Google in the past twelve or so hours, today is Jim Henson’s 75th birthday, and in his honor we share with you a rousing rendition of the How Many Game, hosted by the wonderful Guy Smiley!
Follow up question: should they have won with the sheep?
According to the Muppet Wiki, Guy Smiley’s enthusiasm was rough on Jim Henson’s voicebox, so his portions were rerecorded so that it could be played over and over without Mr. Henson having to keep repeating his dialogue. The Muppet Wiki also says that there were two two-headed monsters: the one in the clip above was designed by Jim Henson, but a second, who was on Fanfare and the Mike Douglas Show rather than Sesame Street, was performed by Jim Henson.
September 20, 2011
Let’s start with ultimate (yes, that seems a bit backwards – stay with me.), as in “last”. The next-to-last, then, is penultimate, easily one of my favorite words. But there’s more! The next-to-next-to-last is the antepenultimate. Need another? The -last is the preantepenultimate, a completely real word that Chrome’s built-in dictionary has never seen (it suggests “prearrangement”).
Why am I telling you all this? I mean, besides the sheer ridiculousness/awesomeness of a word for the fourth-to-last item in a list? I needed an excuse to post this video:
August 24, 2011
From a recent Nature Valley ad in the London Metro newspaper:
Perhaps the second bar is twice as delicious as the first.
Via Language Log. Photo from Spiderham.
April 22, 2011
The folk from Glee paid unintended homage to the title of this week’s episode (“A Night of Neglect”) by showing Mr. Schuester forgetting his basic math skills. Actually that’s not entirely true; he does math in his head correctly as he explains his plan to use salt-water taffy to earn money to go to Nationals in New York:
When I was a student here we paid for our entire trip to Nationals selling this…. So, to make $5000 at 25 cents apiece, we need to sell 20,000 pieces of taffy.
So far, so good. But wait, what’s that equation in the background?
Poor Will…he didn’t even notice that the equation wasn’t quite right (and neither did the four members of the Academic Decathalon team). But don’t worry, we understand how busy this time of year is, what with all the projects and end of the year assignments coming due. So shall we just fix that up for you?
There, all better. Now you can go concentrate on raising that money. Just be sure to have someone else in charge of the ledger.
April 19, 2011
For no reason that I can think of, I decided to see how much Wolfram Alpha knew about probability, so I typed “probability of a full house” into the search box and got the following:
I thought that was pretty cool, especially since it includes the derivations, so I asked a few more questions, such as “probability of at least 2 red cards in a 5 card hand“:
Odd that it will count the numerator but not the (easier) denominator . At this point, I thought I’d try a standard probability question (balls in an urn) that might be harder to parse because of the additional statements: “probability of drawing a blue ball from an urn contaiing 5 blue balls and 7 red balls“. However, I missed the ‘n’ key when typing “containing” and got the following:
So, yeah, OK, Wolfram Alpha doesn’t provide “adult” content (why the quotes?), and I’m pretty sure I know what it’s reading as “adult”, but c’mon. Note that fixing the typo doesn’t alleviate the problem, but it does cause Alpha to hiccup and request more computing time. With variations on the wording, I’ve also had it return a picture of a blue ball along with the HTML code to generate it. Nice.
April 12, 2011
Godzilla is a well-known mind-reader, and in honor of final exams, which are coming up sooner than seems possible, he’d like to demonstrate his powers. Even over the internet, because his powers are MIGHTY. Like him.
Start with 3-digit number that is not a palindrome (so 360 is OK, but 363 is not). Then reverse the digits, and subtract the smaller number from the larger. You get a NEW AND IMPROVED number. So if you do start with 360, your NEW AND IMPROVED number will be 297 (which is 360 minus 063).
Treating your NEW AND IMPROVED number as a 3-digit number, reverse the digits. This means that if your NEW AND IMPROVED number appeared to only have two digits, or even one, then you have to tack on one or two leading zeros that you include in the reversal.
Now add your NEW AND IMPROVED number to its reverse. Godzilla will now tell you the sum, even over all the miles and electrons that separate you from this friendly beast…..
Read the rest of this entry »
April 10, 2011
The Carnival of Mathematics is still going strong. This round – #76 – is hosted over at Walking Randomly and has, as usual, something for everyone, including a post from one my favorites: Language Log. (Yes, they use math there. Fairly often, in fact.) Go check it out, and while you’re at it, contact Mike if you’d like to host one.
April 9, 2011
Friday’s Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. (Click to view the original along with the bonus content.)
So which are you?
April 8, 2011
We luv us some failblog (regular or decaf), particularly on a Friday. Lately they’ve had a bunch of math fails, where “lately” means “since the last time we posted from there” and “bunch” is closer in number to “I bought a bunch of bananas” than “I have a bunch of papers to grade”. So without further ado, here are some favorites.
There’s trouble with dates:
and trouble with money:
and lots of trouble with percents:
Apparently, as Barbie once said, math is hard.
April 6, 2011
The number 1729 has a right to be proud : it initially had only a small role on a taxicab in England but its super-power of being the sum of two positive cubes in not one but two ways (13+123 and 93+103) led to a big break in a Feature Story starring GH Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan, with follow-up appearances for years to come on the likes of Futurama and Proof. So, you know, yay 1729.
But lest this Hardy-Ramanjuan number get too boastful, it’s not the only sequin at the Oscars. Its neighbor, that unassuming 1728, turns out to be an interesting character in its own right.
The origin of this is in the dozen. Although ten is a pretty natural base to use, in the sense that a lot of cultures break numbers up by tens in some form, it’s not the only possibility. We have not only a special word for 12 (dozen), but a special word for 122 (gross), which suggests that our language carries hints of a Base 12 system. And that leads to the question: is there a special name for 123?
There is! The official name is a Great Gross. And while dozen and gross show up in egg cartons, it’s in measurement that the great gross really shines: there are a dozen inches in a foot, a gross square inches in a square foot, and a great gross cubic inches in a cubic foot.
But while the great gross is helping out with set design, there’s a rumor (which we’re apparently happy to help spread) that 1728 actually has a stage name. That’s because there’s a theorem about L-functions of elliptic curves called the Gross-Zagier Theorem, named after Benedict Gross and Don Zagier. So the natural extension of a gross is…a Zagier! Or at least that’s the name that 1728 goes by on the cocktail circuit according to Wikipedia, our local gossip rag. Which makes us wonder where this down-to-earth yet whimsical number will show up next.
In an amusing turn of events, it turns out that Gross and Zagier won the Frank Nelson Cole prize in Number Theory in 1987 from the American Mathematical Society for their paper “Heegner points and derivatives of L-series” which contained the above theorem. The other winner that year for a different paper was Dorian M. Goldfeld who, the following year, published a paper with M. Anshel entitled “Applications of the Hardy-Ramanujan partition theory to linear diophantine problems,” bringing it all back full-circles to the people who made 1729 famous. It’s like one giant family reunion.
April 4, 2011
See Mini-G look at this fine piece of stripey art:
Isn’t that interesting, full of nuance? NO — it looks totally boring. But Mini-G is actually looking at it at an angle, which turns out to be a completely different story.
No more simple stripes! And while it’s no Mona Lisa*, it’s pretty cool to see the shapes appear just as you start to walk away in search of something less vertical to look at. Even better, it’s simple knitting. REALLY simple knitting, just knits and purls, where using stockinette stitch makes a color fade into the background when viewed from the side, and using garter stitch makes a color stand out. There’s a great explanation here, where “great”=“uses legos”.
This comes from Woolly Thoughts (“In pursuit of Crafty Mathematics”) and their newish illusion site. It’s a free pattern — Woo hoo! — and not that I’m suggesting that you knit during meetings or anything, but if you DID knit during meetings this particular pattern is simple enough that you can do it without being distracted from the Important Conversations and Presentations, and then you can feel good at the end of two hours that you made quite a bit of progress on your knitting whether the meeting led to a resolution or not, plus you get to point out that you’re really doing mathematics if anyone asks what you’re knitting. Win-win!
* though there is a pattern for that.